Democratic Congressional Priorities

 

A Big Win

Fueled by anger at the Iraq War, Bush’s ‘War on Terrorism’, New Republican economic policies (inequality, debt and stagnation) and corruption, more mainstream Americans went to the polls than expected.  Thus Democrats regained control of both the house and the Senate, winning 32 additional house seats, 6 additional senate seats, and many additional governors and state legislators.  This might not have happened until 2008, except for a series of bad news about the Iraq War which even Bush could not explain away.

 

Our conventional wisdom often suggests that Independents are some type of moderate Liberal-Conservative mixture.  Two thirds of Independents are Liberals, many more consistently liberal that the Democrats (who sometimes simply want to win regardless of ideology).  A high percentage of Independents voted and two thirds voted for Democrats.

 

New Democratic Legislators

Howard Dean’s 50 State Strategy appears to have paid off big time for winning both national and local contests in both blue and red states.  Passionate supporters are not enough to win, they must be organized.  Democratic candidates won in various red states.  Even when they only threatened to win, they diverted Republican resources from other races.

 

Rahm Emanuel’s recruitment of well qualified candidates was also important.  Emanuel is primarily concerned with Democratic victories regardless of the ideology of the winners and the means used to obtain their victory.  Howard Dean wants Democratic winners to be Liberals and disparages deceptive campaigning.  Contrary to the Conservative pundits, our newly elected Democrats are as liberal as our long term Democratic legislators and their leaders.  Many have run what are called populist campaigns, against unfair taxation, corruption by powerful business interests, decline of our middle class, increased collapse of our safety net, etc.

 

Legislative Priorities

Our Democrats should find it easy to agree on legislative priorities and strategies.

 

1. Ethics Reform

The highest priority will be ethics reform, including reduction of lobbyist influence, treating the minority Republicans fairly and seeking bipartisan solutions without sacrificing Liberal values.  Hopefully many other electoral, campaign and legislative process reforms will follow.

 

2. Economic Fairness and Safety Net

A second priority will be economic fairness, including repealing the huge subsidies for oil companies, bargaining with pharmaceutical companies to lower the price of Medicare medicines, lowering the interest rates that banks can charge for student loans, raising the minimum wage, etc.  Hopefully (when Bush is replaced by a Liberal in 2008), our taxes will be made much more progressive.

 

It will take awhile, but escalating medical care expenditures with more patients left behind will require basic health care reforms.  Democrats may also provide legal status for immigrants needed for our workforce.  Democrats will also replace ideology with science, supporting stem cell research, taking steps to reduce global warming, mandating less use of carbon-based energy and protecting our eco-systems.

 

3. Bi-Partisan Foreign Policy

Democrats will attempt to restore a bi-partisan foreign policy, which gets us out of Iraq and cooperates with the intelligence and police agencies of foreign countries to prevent terrorism and pursue terrorists.  Unfortunately our hysteria over terrorism may produce enormously expensive surveillance measures and increases in unnecessary military spending.  Similarly, we may fruitlessly spend a lot to prevent immigration as we do to prevent the import of drugs.

 

4. Civil Liberties

Another area of liberal concern is the greatest assault upon our civil liberties (by the Patriot acts and other legislative and administrative acts) since our Republic was founded.  As with previous periods of hysteria about threats to our country following World Wars I and II, we may simply have to wait until the hysteria abates.  Hopefully as occurred with previous repressive legislation, very few people will be harassed by the Patriot act.  We will not become like the Soviet Union.

 

5. Social Legislation

The growing strategic consensus is that liberals should attempt to stimulate mainstream grassroots support for social legislation instead of trying to pass it before our public is ready.  Both long term and newly elected Democrats may place a low priority upon legislation concerning gun control, gay marriage and eliminating restrictions on women’s reproductive choice.  This does not mean that these issues as unimportant, but only that any legislation costs more effort than the relief it would provide.

 

6. Continuing Corporate Influence

Both traditional and new Democrats are susceptible to corporate influence.  Corporate influence must be viewed as the reason many Democratic legislators voted for the repressive bankruptcy legislation.  No major extension of health coverage is possible without eliminating the enormously costly employer – private insurance company financing, but Democrats have continually attempted compromise with private insurers and failed. The biggest challenge may be not disagreement between long term and new legislators, but instead the fragmented responsibility for legislation among various house committees and subcommittees.

  

A New Liberal Era

We have paid an enormous price for giving power to Bush and his New Republican Colleagues.  But through their excessive deception, incompetence and corruption, they have succeeded in wrecking the traditional Republican Party.  Already the various types of Conservatives are blaming each other for their losses.  Many Republicans are deciding to retire from congress.  This should help Democrats to elect our president and even more legislators in 2008.

 

Our sweeping victory may be the beginning of the largest liberal period in American History.  Our American mainstream is more liberal than ever before.  With urbanization, immigration and changes in household composition, we have become more tolerant of diversity.  Unfortunately our diversity may have lessened our sense of community.  With a loss of oneness, we may be less compassionate.  But as our personal insecurity has increased, we are more concerned with strengthening our safety net.  United Democrats (with few Trojan Horse Conservatives among them) can respond to our mainstream tolerance and compassion, with divided Republicans unable to oppose them.  Dave Thomas